Track Google Rankings plugin provided by search engine optimization.

- Hide menu

Blog

After the fire.

I recently posted this image over at Google+ where it was well received and so I thought I might repost it here on the blog.    The image was taken in June,  2009,  some 4 months after the most devastating bush-fires in memory occurred in my home state of Victoria.    I recently revisited the image,  tucked away as it was on my hard drive,  and decided to reprocess it.   As you can see,  I went with a toned monochrome treatment and,  although I’m not generally a big fan of border effects and frames on images,  I experimented with a torn edge like border effect here.
after the fire, Flowerdale, Victoria. (Kevin Dowie)

“After the fire.”

Canon 5D, Focal Length: 700.0 mm Shutter Speed 1/800 second, Aperture F7.1, ISO 800.

Spam message of the week?

Recently over on Facebook,  I posted a web link:   Tom reads his spam.    As the title suggests,  it is simply a blogger reading nonsense messages from his spam email folder but,  I at least,  found it rather amusing.   “Tom” has an excellent “radio voice” and manages to make fun of those idiotic spam messages that drive all of us a bit mad.
Which brings me to one of numerous spam messages I got this week through the blog’s commenting system.   With Akismet installed,  these “comments” are thankfully intercepted before ever seeing the light of day on the published blog.   Supposedly in response to a blog posting of about 2 years ago featuring an abstract image of grasses growing in water (so totally off topic)  and reproduced here without editing.

“Who’s the chubby chkeeed chap sitting in front of that mysterious womam in the dark glasses?Looks like the African lifestyle [read luxury safari lodges] is agreeing with him…”

I wonder how this would sound if read by Tom.   I fear that with the spelling mistakes, even he would struggle with this one!     :-)    KD

Oh!   One more thing before I hit the “Publish” button.   You’ll notice that I’ve incorporated some social sharing buttons at the foot of the blog entry.   “Big deal,  lots of sites have that”,  I hear you say.   Well the one I wish to draw particular attention to is the “Print with Print Friendly” button.   Until recently I wasn’t aware of this facility and it really looks useful.   As the name suggests,  if you click on that button it will generate a printable and downloadable PDF file for the blog entry you’re looking at.   In the past I’ve made some instructional PDF files available for download through my web site,  but with this capability,  it will be possible to make such files available directly from the blog page at the click of an on screen button!  Happy days.

Parliamentary Inquiry into software pricing.

As a follow up to my previous blog entry regarding software price gouging in Australia (The Great Adobe Lightroom Ripoff),  I note that a Parliamentary Inquiry is to be conducted into the issue.   Whilst my earlier blog entry was focused specifically on Adobe’s pricing policies, it’s clear that (in the Australian context at least) this is part of a wider problem where overseas (for the most part US) based software companies engage in blatant price gouging based on customer location.

As reported in several newspapers including the Sydney Morning Herald the issue has come to the attention of Australia’s Federal Parliament with concerns raised regarding the policies of several companies including Apple and Adobe.

From the SMH article:

-The debate over pricing surfaced again last week when global software company Adobe revealed Australians would pay up to $1400 more for the same software compared with US residents

-”The excuses overseas technology companies used to justify the higher prices, such as the small size of the market, the cost of setting up support centres and the imposition of local taxes and duties, were not acceptable.” - Choice spokeswoman Ingrid Just,  (Choice is a non-profit consumer advocate group which publishes a magazine of the same title. ~KD)

-In the words of one Australian Web developer,  it’s  ”the Australia Tax, the tax we pay just by being in Australia”.

 

The SMH goes on to cite last years Productivity Commission report,   which I’ll quote more fully here;

-Some international suppliers have attempted to defend price discrimination due to the cost of supplying a remote and relatively small market like Australia, which in some cases has its own unique requirements. These arguments, in most cases, are not persuasive, especially in the case, for example, of downloaded music, software and videos where the costs of delivery to the customer are practically zero and uniform around the world.    (Ref:  Australian Government-Productivity Commission Inquiry, Report No. 56. 4, Page 23, Regional price discrimination is now much more visible.  November 2011)

 

The key phrase here being  “….the costs of delivery to the customer are practically zero and uniform around the world“.

With the current state of Australian Federal politics being what it is,  with a hung parliament,  decisions based on sweet-heart deals with minor parties and single issue focused independents,  a lack of willingness to act in a decisive and timely manner with apparently corrupt colleagues etc,  it’s hard to be too optimistic that this issue will see forceful action.    It can only be hoped that enough publicity is generated to embarrass, shame, or otherwise inspire these companies, including Adobe,  to start treating their customers with some respect.     ~KD.

 

The Great Adobe Lightroom ripoff.

Well,  here we all are in the global village,  interconnected like never before in history.    We are living in the age of instantaneous global communications,  the internet,  satellites,  live streaming interactive webcams!   An age where commandos can storm a building in Pakistan in the middle of the night and hunt down a fugitive,  whilst the US President and his staff sit in the white house and watch a live video feed,  collected from a tiny in-helmet camera,  with all the immediacy of a first person shooter video game.    One of the amazing things is that this communications technology is available to just about everyone.

I recall during my childhood where interactive telecommunications meant walking down the street to a public telephone box,  hoping that it hadn’t been vandalized,  putting a coin in the slot,  dialling the number and hoping that the person at the other end was home and not already using their phone.   If the person you were calling lived in another city or state…..good luck….and as for calling internationally,  that was virtually unheard of.

So why am I pointing all this out?    Well in addition to sending emails, streaming videos,  etc,  the internet now facilitates international commerce and the distribution of software.   Which brings me to the point of this article.

Among the software programs which I (and a whole lot of other folks) use are those developed and distributed by Adobe,  including Photoshop and Photoshop Lightroom.    Let’s be clear at the outset,  these are great programs,  I use them extensively and recommend them to others,  gee,  I’ve even been known to give advice to others on how to get the best out of these programs!   But where Adobe really falls down badly is in the area of international pricing.   To put it bluntly,  Adobe actively and blatantly engages in discrimination based on a customers country of domicile.   (I hate using the phrase “Racial Discrimination”….but)

A case in point is the pricing policy for Adobe’s Lightroom version 4 released early this year.    Having used Lightroom 3 and been pleased with it,  I naturally considered upgrading to LR4.   This is when the problem arose.   Adobe advertise all over the internet that this upgrade is available for US$79.   However this is the price for North American based customers,  elsewhere prices vary with the most obvious discrepancy being for Australian (and New Zealand) customers where the price is over US$100 when the upgrade is done by download.

"I'm alright Jack, screw you" (A message from Adobe Headquarters?)

I am far from being the first Australian customer to grumble about this,  Adobe’s own blogsites are overflowing with complaints.   A posting at  http://blogs.adobe.com/photoshopdotcom/2012/03/lightroom-4-now-available.html   has (when I last checked) 112 comments of which at least 50 are from Aussies disgruntled about the pricing policy.

Another thread,  again on one of Adobe’s own forums http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2012/03/lightroom-4-0-now-available.html  is loaded with complaints. A quick survey of comments includes…

I’ve bought Lightroom since LR2 and upgraded every time despite the stupid Australian pricing policy because I’ve really wanted to support Adobe….Unfortunately Adobe’s absurd policy has continued and now after paying only $123.75 last upgrade the new discounted price will cost me AU$122.38! (not sure why people are saying $104) The price should be $74.83 yet for my extra $50 I still get stupid “US English” and crappy support to boot

…….

Whilst I would really like to support the Lightroom team for all their hard work, this time around I can no longer support Adobe as a business and would prefer that they go broke. I’ll hang onto my cash and if I find I can’t live with Lightroom 3 then I’ll simply pirate like everyone else does until Adobe fix their stupid policy

…….

A question from outside the USA: Why do you advertise a price worldwide that is actively prevented to those outside USA? And for a downloaded product! ….it is patently unfair to hike up the price of a downloaded upgrade based on where you live

…..

I used Lightroom 4 beta and found it an improvement over Lightroom 3.   I live in Australia and am very disappointed that upgrade in Australia is over $120 yet upgrade in USA is $79./ The dollars have roughly equal value.   I now am considering not upgrading.   This price structure is unfair

……

“at Adobe we are listening”. Really???? The unfairness of price differential, and the fact that the price is not “$149″ for those new to LR and “$79″ upgrading as this page states has been pointed out repeatedly (here and elsewhere). Will you face you critics and have a level field for downloaded programs or be honest with your pricing…or just continue to ignore the issue that faces all your international customer base?? Come on do the right thing!!!!

…..

The price for both full version and upgrade in Australia are dearer, yet our exchange rate is better.   (Why can’t) I buy the online download from the US at $79.00?

…..

Was almost ready to upgrade for the $USD79 but like many here found the upgrade was over $USD100 because I don’t live in the US….. C’mon this is a downloaded product there is no shipping and no tax. I like LR3 and it does the job well don’t see $100 of reasons to upgrade

……

So what exactly is the situation for Australian customers wishing to upgrade?   Well if you try to purchase via the US website,  your location is noted and you can’t complete the transaction.  You’ll be directed to the Adobe Australia site  where you’ll see the pricing as follows:

“Upgrade from A$108.62 inc GST*  A$98.75 ex. GST”   “Save time and GST – choose delivery by electronic download”

For readers outside of Australia,  GST means Goods and Services Tax,  this is an Australian Federal Government tax which is levied at a rate of 10% on most goods and services purchased in Australia. The first price relates to the boxed physical product and hence it attracts the GST,  the second price is an internet download and as such doesn’t attract GST.
So why the price discrepancy?    Well some thoughts have been put forward on the forums,  but they can readily be dismissed.  They include;

  • –Maybe it’s because of packaging and handling.     (Not an issue,  we’re talking about an internet download)
  • –Maybe it’s because of taxes.    (No it’s not.   As a download it doesn’t attract GST or any other tax.   Even if it was imported as a physical product,  it wouldn’t attract GST unless its value was in excess of $1000,  much to the chagrin of traditional retailers, just ask Gerry Harvey)
  • –Maybe it’s because of foreign exchange rates.  (No it’s not.  The Australian dollar is currently worth US$1.04.   The Australian dollar has been valued higher than the US dollar continuously for the last 2 years or so)

 

So again we have to ask,  why the price discrepancy?   One of the frustrating things I’ve observed in this whole controversy,  is the complete lack of response from Adobe on the subject.   Complaint after complaint on Adobe’s own blogs but not a whisper,  not a whimper in response!  Nothing, zero, zilch, nada,  not a sausage!    (checking for a webcam at Adobe headquarters…..is that a tumbleweed rolling down the corridor?   Hello,  anyone home?   Are they crickets I can hear?)

The price difference is only $25 or so,  so why make a big deal out of it?   Doesn’t sound like a lot of money does it?   And in the overall context of pursuing a photographic hobby it’s not.   Let’s see,  I’m using a $3000 camera fitted with a $1500 lens,  mounted on a $500 tripod and I’m processing the files on a $1000 computer with a $1000 backup hard drive,  etc, etc,  which all adds up to… $$$ plenty!

But it’s not the money per se,  it’s the principle and the impression that customers are being ignored or worse still taken advantage of.    Companies such as Adobe agonize over,  and rail against,  software piracy but they themselves behave in such a way as to encourage it.   Treat people like fools and you can expect them to behave like fools.

Bottom Line here:   Please Adobe stop treating your (non US based) customers like fools and please end your discriminatory pricing model.   Software purchases and upgrades are a two way street,  and so is customer loyalty!

Image compositing using Photoshop

Following on from my previous blog entry….which was…um…(insert sound of crickets)….six weeks ago….   Today I finally get around to posting a more detailed look at the image processing steps involved in the “White Tern taking flight” picture.    (Make sure to read through to the end of the post as I’ve included a couple of useful resources!  Including access to the original image files for those that may wish to experiment with the processing for themselves)

White Tern taking off. (Kevin Dowie)

White Tern taking off, Midway Atoll.

The final image,  (shown above)  a panoramic format shot of a white tern launching into flight from a small branch.   I’d been watching and photographing this bird for a couple of minutes through the telephoto lens with a tele-extender attached so total focal length 700mm (500mm +1.4x extender).   I had the shutter speed and aperture that I wanted and had acquired focus.   As the bird leapt into flight I got a shot of it but,  on reviewing the image on the camera’s LCD, I wasn’t happy with the composition.

Figure 1. The "left side image".

Figure 1 (Above):  the first frame,  the bird nicely in focus,  but a bit too close to the right edge of the frame for my liking.

Figure 2 (Below):  Recognizing that I wanted more image to the right of the first shot and with the camera and lens combination mounted on a tripod with gimble mount, I swung the lens around a little and got a second shot allowing for a bit of overlap between the two frames. (notice the position of the branch in each frame)

Figure 2, the "right side image"

  The important thing at the time of taking the second shot was to ensure that the focus didn’t change.   Notice in the second shot (as in the first) the end of the branch is in focus but the background (most of the second image) is out of focus.   Having used auto focus to initially acquire sharp focus on the bird,  it was important not to accidentally engage AF on the second shot.   This could have been ensured a couple of ways.  Switching to manual focus and taking the second frame without touching the focusing ring on the lens is an obvious way.  In this case switching focusing methods wasn’t required.   One of the things which I’ve done in setting up my cameras is to disengage auto focusing from the shutter button and only use rear button AF.  So simply don’t touch the rear AF button and use the shutter button without fear.

In photoshop the first step was to open both files,  then with the first image, (the one with the bird in it)  which from here on I’ll refer to as the “left side image”,  I checked the image dimensions.  Menu: Image/Size or keyboard Alt+Ctrl+I.   The image being 5000 pixels by 3600 pixels I knew that in order to composite both frames and allowing for the overlap,  I would need to create a composite image of roughly 8000×4400 pixels.   I next created a new layer and dragged it below the left side image file in the layers stack.   By doing this I would be able to position the two image frames on the enlarged canvas and have some flexibility in dragging them around and positioning them.   So to create additional canvas,  with the new blank layer selected,   Menu: Image/Canvas or keyboard Alt+Ctrl+C to bring up the canvas dialogue box.  Enter the new dimension values and select white fill from the canvas dialogue options.

Figure 3, expanded canvas.

Figure 4

Next up,  bring the “right side” image onto the expanded canvas which we’ve created.   Simply click and drag the image over.   Then reduce the opacity of the “right side” layer so that you can judge just how far out of alignment it is with the left side image.    As seen (Figure 4, above) here,  using the branch as a guide,   the right side image needs to be moved.   Select the move tool Keyboard V and with the right side image layer active,  grab and drag till the images line up.   To get fine control on this,  zoom in and then use the up-down-left-right arrows on your keyboard to nudge the image 1 pixel at a time.  Once you’re happy the images are aligned bring the opacity back up to 100% (Figure 5).   As can be seen here the images are not level,  but thanks to being taken on the tripod,  they don’t require rotating.   Had the right side image required rotating then keyboard Ctrl+T for the free transform tool and grab a corner and rotate till it looks right.

Figure 5

As can be seen in the previous screen capture,  because the two images are not level,  when image alignment is done there is “stepping”.  How to overcome this?  I decided to transform parts of the 2 image layers so as to “fill in” the gaps.   A selection was made,  with the rectangular marquee selection tool, keyboard M, on the bottom left corner of the “left side” image and it was then placed on its own layer Keyboard: Ctrl+J.   That new layer was then transformed keyboard: Ctrl+T and the selection was dragged out so that it expanded down into the blank space.   This “pixel stretching” needs to be done with caution.   You are working with a finite piece of information and can only stretch it so far before the image quality goes off noticeably.    This procedure was then repeated to the top of the right side image.    The result can be seen in Figure 6 (below).

Figure 6. With transformations applied to corners.

As can be seen at the above stage there are differences between the two image layers in terms of lightness and colour balance.  In order to correct these differences I used 2 curves adjustment layers and applied them to the left side image (and the transformed bottom corner)

Figure 7. Curves adjustment layer for lightening.

 

In order to lighten the left side image I applied the curves adjustment seen here (Figure 7).   A point in the middle of the histogram is pulled up lightening the image till it looks consistent with the right side image.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 8. Curves to change blue-yellow balance.

 

The left side image appears cold in tone,  a bit too blue,  compared to the right side image.  There are a couple of ways to fix this,  a colour balance adjustment layer perhaps,  but I chose to use a second curves adjustment layer.  (Figure 8)  In this case I selected the blue channel and dragged the curve downwards.  Blue and yellow being complimentary colours,  if you reduce blue,  you are effectively increasing yellow.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 9. The composite image with curves adjustments.

The composite with the transformations and curves adjustments applied (Figure 9, Above).    The bird isn’t visible at this point because the right side image above the left side image in the layers stack.  It shall soon be revealed!

Figure 10. The layers stack.

 

At left (Figure 10) can be seen the layers stack.   Firstly from the bottom we see the white base layer which we expanded early on to give us the canvas necessary to fit everything on.  Then the left side image,  followed by the transformed bottom left corner.   The right side image and the transformed top right corner layers are further up.

Between the left side and right side elements are the curves adjustment layers.  Their position is important as they only influence the layers below them,  not the layers above them.    In order to reveal the bird (and the clean up the edge of the right side image which is visible against the underlying left side image) it’s necessary to do some masking.  So that the masking applies to both the right side image and the transformed top right element I grouped those two layers together by highlighting both layers and then Keyboard:Ctrl+G.

By painting on the mask with a soft black brush the underlying image is revealed.   Black reveals,  white conceals!      note: it’s good practice to name your layers as you go to avoid confusion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 11. Masking the "right side" to reveal the bird on the underlying layer.

 

To see the mask on its own,  hold down the “Alt” key and click on the mask,  it will then be displayed as above.   To return to normal viewing hold down the Alt key and click on the mask a second time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 12. Cropping.

Next step is to crop the image,  keyboard C for the crop tool and drag it out to where it looks best.   (Figure 12, above)   Note:  For reasons that aren’t clear to me,  the colour values in this example image don’t look right,  this isn’t due to the photoshop procedures explained here but seems to be related to the screen capture procedure.   The key here is the cropping!  Drag it out as you require and hit the enter key.

So there you have it, the photoshop processing of the “White Tern taking off” image.   I find now that I’m using Lightroom for more and more of my image processing needs,  however where you wish to composite images,  photoshop is still de rigour.    Having completed the compositing,  I saved it as a layered TIFF file.   Back into Lightroom for noise reduction,  sharpening and a very subtle vignette.   Hopefully,  for readers who are new to Photoshop,  this has given you a few ideas and techniques that you can employ in your own photographic endeavours.   One thing which I do recommend to people is that they learn some of the keyboard shortcuts.  I,  like most users,  find that there are probably about a dozen that I use frequently and they are real time savers rather than continually clicking through menus.

 

Some useful Photoshop Keyboard  Shortcuts and Hints.

Function Accessing via Menu. Keyboard Shortcut
Image size Image/Image Size Alt+Ctrl+I
Canvas size: Image/Canvas Size Alt+Ctrl+C
New Layer via Copy Layer/New/Layer via Copy Ctrl+J
Merge Visible Layer/Merge Visible Shift+Ctrl+E

Selection Tools:

Marquee Tool M
Lasso Tool L
Quick Selection Tool W
Deselect Select/Deselect Ctrl+D

Using Brushes:

Brush Tool B
Changing brush on the fly: Left Square Bracket key [ for smaller brush diameter
Right Square Bracket key ] for larger brush diameter
Shift + [ for softer brush edge
Shift + ] for harder brush edge
Brush colours
Default black and white D
Switching foreground and background brush colours X
Clone Stamp S
Healing brush J
Crop Tool C
Free Transform Edit/Free Transform Ctrl+T
Save for Web and Devices. File/Save for Web and Devices Alt+Shift+Ctrl+S

A Couple of (FREE) Downloads.

      • Would you like to download these image files and experiment with some of the techniques outlined above?    Click on the following link:  white_tern_photoshop_exercise  NOTE:  When you are prompted for a password,  enter the words:  white_tern (note the underscore).    You should then be able to download the two image files.  These files are 16 bit TIFF files,  each of about 3 megabytes.     Please note that like all the material on my blog and website,  the images are the subject of copyright and they are made available here for the personal (non-commercial) use of my blog readers.     Also note that the images have been downsized from their original dimensions,  so you’ll need to consider the appropriate canvas size when you’re at that point in the process.
      • Would you like the photoshop keyboard shortcuts shown above in a simple printable form?    Grab the FREE (there’s that word again!) downloadable PDF,  20 useful photoshop shortcuts,  print them out and keep them near your computer whilst you work.    After a while they’ll be committed to memory!

If you have found this of value,  do consider subscribing to my blog updates!    And while you’re at it,  let your friends know too!      :-)   ~KD.

 

White tern taking off, Midway Atoll.

Midway Atoll and a beautiful white tern takes off from an exposed branch on a small tree.    With the 500mm telephoto focused on the bird as it perched on the branch and a bit of space around the subject in the frame,  I was able to get the tern entirely within frame even as it took off.   Fortunately I had enough depth of field and the bird took off pretty much parallel to the sensor plane so that I still had good focus.

White Tern taking off. (Kevin Dowie)

White Tern taking off, Midway Atoll.

The problem here is that in the original frame, due to its movement, the bird was now right at the edge of the frame.  Immediately after taking the shot, I checked the cameras LCD and saw the framing issue.  What to do?

Image Compositing

With the camera and lens mounted on a tripod, and not having moved the setup after taking the first frame, I realised that there was the prospect of getting a pleasing final result via image compositing. With this in mind, I framed a second image slightly to the right of the first, allowing for some overlap, much as you would for stitching panoramics.   I was careful not to engage auto focus when taking the second shot as it would have refocused onto the background foliage.

White Tern_the original file

The original file (except for my watermark of course) straight out of the camera.   I’m happy with focus and the wing position of the bird, but,  and this is purely subjective,  I feel the bird is a bit too close to the right edge of the frame.

The second shot, right of the original frame taken moments later.

The second shot taken from the same position,  same aperture,  same focus.    A few seconds had passed between the shots and light levels changed slightly with the result that the camera, which was on aperture priority, selected a different shutter speed.   The change in shutter speed isn’t critical but the light has changed not only in intensity but also in colour temperature,  notice that the second image is warmer than the original.

The two images brought together in Photoshop.

Notice the alignment of the two images.    I failed to keep the framing of the second image exactly level with the framing of the first but remember,  this was not a planned process but an exercise in problem solving having seen the original image and then deciding on a second frame.   Also the colour temperature difference becomes apparent here.

To be continued….

As I am preparing this blog post and commenting on this image it becomes apparent to me that there are actually a number of technique issues arising,  several of which are probably worthy of more detailed discussion.    From comments and emails that I’ve received I’m aware that some readers are relatively new to digital image processing and may benefit from an in depth look at the photoshop processing of this image.    With that in mind,  I’ll set myself the task of posting a step by step explanation over the next few blog posts.       Stay tuned!   :-)   KD

Photographing Albatross, something less obvious!

As regular readers will know, I spent a fair bit of time photographing seabirds, including albatross, last year.   Here I am months and months later and I’m still posting the pictures (will I ever catch up?), but today something a little less obvious.   This image has had very little processing, a minor crop, and of course the captioning.   The content of the image is the result of observation, planning and a bit of good timing, not compositing or overlaying of images.   I’ve been experimenting a little lately with texture blending in Photoshop, but when nature provides you with a great texture of her own, well why not use it? :-)

 (Kevin Dowie)

The making of a monochrome panorama.

Digital processing using Photoshop.  An Example.

In 2005,  I was fortunate enough to travel through Latin America,  and of course my camera(s) went with me.    After touring through the Yucatan Peninsula region of Mexico,  and some of the neighbouring countries,  I visited the Galapagos Islands.  Famed,  from the time of Charles Darwin’s visit aboard HMS Beagle,  for their extraordinary and unique wildlife,  the islands continue to inspire.    During the course of my visit I used two film cameras,  a Pentax SF7 35mm SLR and a Mamiya 7 mk 2 medium format camera.    The following shot was taken using the Mamiya on 6×7 colour negative film,  the negative was subsequently scanned using an Epson V700 flatbed scanner to give the “raw” tiff file which was then processed with Photoshop CS3.   This article gives an outline of the processing steps I used.
Adobe’s Photoshop has become the “standard” for digital image manipulation.   The program is so fully featured that I doubt whether there are many people at all who know,  let alone use,  all it’s possibilities.    Yet despite the hundreds,  or even thousands,  of possible techniques and methods,  the use of just a few can yield pleasing results.

The original image scanned from 6x7 colour negative film.

Above:    The TIFF file prior to processing.    As can be seen,  the image was captured from the deck of a boat and shows the shoreline of one of the islands.    Depth of field is sufficient to retain detail from the foreground handrail through to the horizon.   There are some issues with the initial file that need to be addressed.  Firstly the horizon is not level.    There are some dust spots on the image which need to be removed and then there are decisions to be made,  how do I want to display this image?
After cropping the image,  spot removal will be done with the spot healing brush (keyboard shortcut J)         (I won’t give a detailed example of this here as the spots at this displayed image size are barely visible anyway)

The image cropped to the "panoramic" format.

 The image is levelled by use of the ruler tool.    Nested with the eyedropper tool (keyboard shortcut  I )   the ruler is clicked on the horizon line and then dragged and clicked on another point on the horizon to form the correct horizon or level.    Once the ruler line has been drawn,  select Image/Rotate Canvas/Arbitrary.  This brings up a dialog box indicating the direction and extent to which the canvas will be rotated.  Photoshop works out the amount automatically so click OK.  The image is now level.
Next a decision can be made about cropping the image to the preferred aspect ratio.   This is very much a matter of personal preference.   Keyboard shortcut C for the cropping tool.  The extent of the crop is indicated here by the colour overlay.  Hit enter to commit the crop.

The image cropped and rotated.

Using levels for contrast.

The levels adjustment layer.

 Set black and white points with a levels adjustment layer accessed via the adjustment layer icon.
In this case a fairly subtle change.   The left slider is dragged to the right to set those values on the histogram which should output as black.  The right slider is dragged left to set those values that should display as white.  As can be seen, there were originally no values below 15 nor above 253 so no clipped blacks or whites.   By setting the black and white points in this way the overall contrast of the image is increased.

With the levels adjustment applied, there is more contrast in the scene.

The black and white conversion.

There were a couple of ways I could have gone with this image.  Firstly to stay with colour,  in which case I probably would have increased the colour saturation given that the shot was taken in flat middle of the day light and is fairly washed out,  or go to black and white.   There are numerous ways of converting to black and white,  I use a black and white conversion adjustment layer.   It’s simple to scroll through the filter presets till you get an effect that is close to what you require.   The filter presets mimic the effect of using coloured filters in traditional black and white film photography.   In this case I used the “red filter” preset as I was looking for increased sky contrast.

The image converted to monochrome by use of a black and white adjustment layer.

Curves for contrast.

At this point I decided I wanted even more contrast in the sky and to darken the mid tones.   Once again a curves adjustment layer was selected via the adjustment layer icon.   I placed a point on the light tones of the clouds so that those values didn’t move and then pulled down the mid tone values.   By steepening the curve,  the contrast was increased.  I then applied a mask to the curves layer so that the effect was not as pronounced on the foreground.

The curves adjustment layer, darkening the midtones and increasing contrast in the lighter tones.

With the curves adjustment layer applied.

 Dodging and burning.

In the traditional darkroom,  different parts of a print could be given different amounts of exposure under the enlarger to either “dodge” or lighten values,  or “burn” or darken values.   In Photoshop I created a new layer via the create new layer icon and filled that layer,  keyboard shortcut Shift+F5 to select the dialog box.   In the dialog box I chose to fill with 50% grey and put the layer into soft light blend mode.   Doing this has no immediate effect on the image.  The effect is seen when you use a soft edged brush at low opacity,  say 10%,  and then brush with white over those parts of the image you wish to lighten and with a black brush over the parts you wish to darken.
I used this method to lighten part of the clouds and specific areas of the land,  and darken the top,  bottom and corners of the image to give a vignette effect.

With "dodging and burning" applied.

The final image:
The final stage was the application of selective sharpening and blurring.   Smart sharpen was used and masked to effect only the central part of the image,  gaussian blur was used and masked to effect only the edges of the frame.    This then left only the application of my signature brush prior to publication on the web.

galapagos-panorama

Galapagos Panorama, the final image.

 There are more ways to process an image than there are ways to cook an egg.    So much depends on individual taste and this simply represents my way,  with this image,  on this occasion.    Whether the final result is an image with some aesthetic or artistic merit or not,  well I’ll leave you to form your own opinion.

Kevin Dowie.            (Article originally published March,  2009.)

 

Landing gear down! Laysan Albatross preparing to land.

Midway Atoll and a laysan albatross has the “landing gear” down,  preparing to land near the beach.    I quite liked the colour version of this image but then thought,  “let’s just see what it looks like in monochrome”.     Into Lightroom’s black and white conversion and then the split toning module.     I’ve experimented with a number of different toning effects over the last 12 months or so but have found a couple of looks which have become favourites.    Given that I’ve used those effects frequently,  it made sense to save them as presets for easy recall.    This particular preset has both the highlights and shadows toned at a “Hue” value of 40 points and a “Saturation” of 10 points.

Laysan Albatross landing approach, Midway Atoll. (Kevin Dowie)

Laysan Albatross landing approach, Midway Atoll.

Canon 5D Mark 2 with 70-300mm zoom at 230mm and F8.0.   Shutter speed 1/1250 second at ISO 400.

Gray-backed Tern (Sterna lunata), Midway Atoll.

Gray-backed Tern  (Sterna lunata), Midway Atoll.  A fairly difficult species to get a decent picture of,  I found.   It seems that some bird species are not too bothered by the photographer who approaches in a quiet,  slow,  non threatening manner,  but this species tended to be rather skittish and wouldn’t tolerate a close approach.   Shot at a focal length of 700mm (the 500mm with a 1.4x converter),  the image still required significant cropping to get to get this final result.   The degree of cropping presented its own challenges as regards to processing the image,  particular care was neccessary in the application of noise reduction and sharpening!   ~KD.

Gray-backed Tern perched on stone, Midway Atoll. (Kevin Dowie)

Gray-backed Tern perched on stone, Midway Atoll.

For more information about the gray-backed terns of Midway Atoll.

 

 

The Elephants of Botswana.

With the recent changes I’ve made to my website and blog, I thought it was time to reorganise some of my earlier content which kind of got lost along the way. This post was originally published just over 2 years ago (apologies to long time readers who’ve seen it before) By reposting within the new blog format, hopefully such content will be easier for folks to locate if using the search facility. ~KD.

    During July-August,  2009,  I was fortunate enough to participate in a photographic safari/workshop in the renowned Okavango Delta region of Botswana.    This trip included game viewing drives in four wheel drive vehicles,  travelling the waterways and channels of the delta in both motorized boats and man powered canoes (mokoros) and also flying in helicopters.  Each of these provided wonderful opportunities to view the wildlife and also the environment in which it lives.

Of the numerous species observed,  one of the most fascinating was elephant which we sighted in significant numbers and at close range.

An adult elephant flares its ears as it approaches the camera.   The shot made more dramatic by the low camera angle.    Early morning,  Kwetsani camp.

 

A herd of elephants crosses the Savuti Channel.     (This shot does not show the entire herd,  which totalled 2 or 3 times the number shown here)

One of our most memorable encounters with elephants occurred at Savuti camp.  Excellent rainfall in the Angolan highlands,  which feed the rivers which in turn flow into the delta,  meant the Savuti channel was high with water for the first time in approximately 20 years.    Immediately adjacent to our camp,  a large herd of elephants assembled at the waters edge to drink before crossing the channel en mass.   This gave us the opportunity to observe some wonderful interaction between members of the herd with females leading their calves,  some of them quite young,  through the water.    Bulls challenged each other testing their strength and asserting themselves,  trying to establish dominance.   Other herd members spent their time splashing around in the water,  playing and simply having fun. This episode occurred during the early afternoon when we were spending some “downtime” eating lunch,  catching up on diary entries,  recharging camera batteries,  tranferring files on laptop computers, etc.    However as events unfolded,  we quickly got the cameras out and started getting some shots.   At one point,  I realized that the best angle on some of the elephants was actually to be had from the toilet/bathroom which had a generously sized glassless window.    Ironically this provided a really good viewpoint!

Savuti Channel. Whilst elephants drink huge quantities of water and wash themselves,  at times it seems they simply love to play in the water.    I took numerous shots of elephants just enjoying splashing around.

 

A clash of titans,  Savuti Channel.     A pair of bulls decide to test each other out,  this encounter lasted for several minutes as each animal attempted to assert its dominance.

 

A bull elephant assumes a sexually dominant position over its rival.  This contest continued for several minutes.

 

Chitabe.      Chitabe provided some fine elephant sightings and elephant numbers were good.   This bull elephant was one of the largest we saw.   Notice the fluid issuing from the gland between the eye and the ear,  this indicates that the animal is in “must”,  in other words,  he’s ready to mate.   During this period the bull becomes increasingly irritable and gives off a distinctive odour which is noticeable even to the human nose at quite a distance.

A few Elephant Facts.

The largest surviving land animals on the planet,  elephants are highly intelligent and sociable.   They can live to 70 years in the wild and can inhabit a variety of different habitats from open grassland to semi desert to forests.   Elephants display a curiosity for,  or a recognition of,  the bones of dead elephants and have been observed picking up and fondling bones.   Perhaps this behaviour gave rise to the myth of elephant graveyards.

Following a gestation period of 22 months,  the newborn calf can typically weigh 90 kilograms and stand a metre tall.    In the event that a calf is orphaned,  the herd will continue to support and nurture it with lactating cows effectively fostering the orphan.

An elephant will typically eat 5% of its body weight in assorted vegetation and consume between 140 and 220 litres of water daily.   It’s diet includes tree leaves and it is common to see elephants stripping leaves from branches.   Where elephant numbers are high and their range restricted,  they can have a profound impact on the environment through the destruction of trees.

Threats and Survival Status.

There are several concerns regarding the future of elephants in the wild.   Among them is the pressure of land use for agriculture and other development and hence loss of habitat.   Also,  whilst there is now a ban on hunting for ivory,  illegal poaching remains a serious concern.   Whilst actually counting elephants is a challenge (they keep moving!),  it’s estimated that the wild population in Africa dropped from 1.3 million to 600,000 between 1977 and 1997.   It’s estimated the current number is between 470,000 and 500,000.

Suggested further reading……

African Wildlife Foundation.

National Geographic